Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake and the bur-tones


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —  Aitias  // discussion 19:10, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Jake and the bur-tones

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Regional band that fails to establish notability per WP:BAND, author(s) removed speedy notices twice, the requirements for reliable third-party sources were explained without success and I assume PROD will have the same effect (none) so AfD'ed this for consensus. §FreeRangeFrog 23:38, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails notability per WP:MUSIC. Searching pulls up no reliable, third-party, sources.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 23:53, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, as noted above, fails notability, article Jake and the Bur-Tones was also posted, and speedied twice yesterday, after being posted by promotional/COI type name User talk:Burtone1. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 01:13, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Utterly fails WP:MUSIC. On second thought, speedy delete anyway, slamdunk A7 if you ask me. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 02:34, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per above. Hogvillian (talk) 02:45, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per A7. cmadler (talk) 14:09, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Declined Let's just let the AfD run its course. Protonk (talk) 16:22, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly fails WP:MUSIC. — Hello, Control Hello, Tony  13:07, 11 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.