Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jakie James Warren


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 18:12, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Jakie James Warren

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable person. Peerage and his famous godmother is not enough to make him personally notable, as notability is not inherited. Night of the Big Wind talk  14:50, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. No substantial coverage in reliable sources. Pburka (talk) 15:29, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:00, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

I am hoping you will not delete this page, and I encourage other contributors. This person is a celebrity/public figure. His connections with Prince Harry and the Princesses of York, his businesses in London & Royal Escot, and his association with the property where a hit TV show is filmed all make him worthy of note. Additionally, he is something of a hearthrob with a large fan following. I'm sure many people will look to this page for tidbits about him. Uspolista (talk) 03:46, 20 December 2011 (UTC) Copied from talkpage article by Night of the Big Wind 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:19, 24 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Subject does not meet notability criteria on own merits. I can't find anything on an internet search that indicates the contrary. asnac (talk) 09:28, 24 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete No personal notability, simply known by association with others. Uspolista rather gives the game away: "His connections with...", "his association with ..." "he is something of a hearthrob" do not justify an article made up of "tidbits". Emeraude (talk) 10:12, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. When a sizable portion of a search brings up links to the AfD and not much else, it's safe to say that you probably don't pass notability guidelines. I wasn't able to find anything reliable that mentioned him that wasn't linked back to the AfD or a blog.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 15:58, 24 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.