Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jakob Aungiers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:33, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Jakob Aungiers

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

This is a ridiculous article, based on virtually nothing -- lack of notability per any standard is patently obvious (particularly after checking for sources -- but even before...). Nomoskedasticity (talk) 05:34, 21 September 2012 (UTC)


 * I am unsure as to Wikipedia's policy on deletion of articles, however it is not my intention for this article to simply be removed. I would however expect an objective viewpoint of the topic at hand, rather than a load of utter trifle written in the format of an autobiography/CV/marketing opportunity. Kellja2001 (talk) 22:06, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:00, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:00, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:00, 22 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Couldn't find any sources either, and the ones in the article don't cut the mustard. Lack of Independent, Significant Sources.  Kellja, our deletion policy hinges on the general notability guideline, which puts the burden on the sources available on the topic.  No strong sources, no article.   The Interior  (Talk) 03:14, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Coverage is not significant. --Boson (talk) 11:49, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete — per nom. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO spectacularly. JFHJr (㊟) 17:18, 22 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:BIO, insufficient coverage in reliable sources. ukexpat (talk) 17:02, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:ATHLETE, WP:AUTO, WP:BIO, WP:GNG, WP:RS. True notability is based on much, much more than merely falling out of planes and then coming onto Wikipedia to write promotional articles about oneself in violation of multiple policies.  In short: WP:42. Qworty (talk) 20:02, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment — On that note, the editor that created this article and uploaded its images,, is indeed the subject. Aungiers appears to use this handle on several websites. Aungiers has also leveled a legal threat in this discussion (see history) and attempted to remove the AfD notice from the article. Given the unabashed WP:OWN, disruptive editing, and legal threats, I think WP:SALT might be a good prophylaxis against repetition seeing as the subject has never been blocked under either account. JFHJr (㊟) 21:36, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Agreed that a good salting would be in order here. Qworty (talk) 22:36, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.