Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jakub Wędrowycz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Andrzej Pilipiuk.  Sandstein  09:36, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Jakub Wędrowycz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fictional character. No notability, zero references Openlydialectic (talk) 20:12, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:11, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:45, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. PWilkinson (talk) 01:46, 9 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment: The subject is a major recurring character in the work of Andrzej Pilipiuk, one of Poland's more prominent speculative fiction authors - and Polish speculative fiction gets enough attention in Poland to make it quite likely (though not certain) that there are enough reliable sources in Polish to establish notability. However, even if so, none of them have been cited in this article and just one in the corresponding Polish Wikipedia article (according to Google Translate). Unfortunately, very few Polish speculative fiction authors get their work noticed in the English-speaking world, Pilipiuk does not seem to be one of the few (though, from this article, I feel that that is our loss), and my knowledge of Polish is effectively non-existent, so I am not in a position to search out extra sources myself. On this basis, unless someone with a knowledge of Polish can improve the article, the best option would be to redirect to Andrzej Pilipiuk. PWilkinson (talk) 01:46, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I agree with your logic here, but there are no references in the article whatsoever, so there's nothing to merge. Openlydialectic (talk) 01:25, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:21, 10 December 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:57, 17 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.