Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jam Creative Productions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Ichiro 05:29, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

Jam Creative Productions
Was tagged for speedy deletion, but companies aren't speediable. Bringing it to AfD to respect the wishes of the anon user who tagged it for deletion. No vote.  howch e  ng   {chat} 22:55, 29 December 2005 (UTC) ''This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks! '' --Ichiro 20:00, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete even if not speedily. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 21:50, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak keep The article lists several claims to notability. However, I'd like to see some references the back them up. &#126;MDD4696 22:04, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep but cleanup Sjc 04:14, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete looks like advertising. Atrian 06:09, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

'This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!' Mo0 [ talk ] 04:13, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep but cleanup. This stub desperately needs some TLC, but the basic article is correct: Jam is one of the two biggest jingle creators in the world, and is a household name to anyone in the radio industry. I'm surprised it never had an article before now. I could try to bring it up to standards, if it survives the AfD. --Aaron 05:50, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, cleanup. Notable company, needs some sourcing and a good list of radio stations. -Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 02:38, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. This company is a part of American pop culture. Probably every person in the Western world has heard their radio jingles at some time. I orginally posted this article and I was really surprised that no one had written about JAM prior to this. They are an icon in the radio industry. I would request that this be taken off the Deletion list. I am interest as to why it was put on it in the first place.Bkirby 00:46, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Once an article has been nominated for deletion, I don't think there's any procedure to just de-nominate it. If there's an overwhelming consensus in one way or the other, the discussion can be declared over, but we don't have a clear consensus here, if for no other reason than not that many people have voted at all. Hopefully once the latest five-day voting period is up, an admin will declare the vote as "keep but cleanup" and I and others can work on rewriting it. I'd start rewriting it now, but I'm not going to waste my time as long as there's even a 1% chance that it's going to get deleted. --Aaron 00:56, 12 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.