Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jam Filled Toronto


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Per WP:SKCRIT#1, the nominator has not only not advanced a reason for deletion, but seems to be under the impression that this is a forum for a name change or the article's content. Procedural close on the basis that it is not- the article talk page is! (non-admin closure) &mdash; fortuna  velut luna  07:38, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Jam Filled Toronto

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I have tried to modify this page to show Jam Filled's true history. Jam Filled did not purchase Arc Productions, It did not change it's name to Arc Productions. Arc Productions went bankrupt and Jam Filled purchased some of the assets only. The contracts were renegotiated with the client and many ex Arc employees were hired many people back. In stead of removing this page, I suggest changing it back to Arc Productions and stating that is went bankrupt. Jam Filled is celebrating it's 10th year anniversary this year, and we do not want to be associated with the past of Arc Productions. Although we now share some history, we have our own and would like to create a page for that.

On a side note, over the past 12 years, I have worked for all the companies continuously from DKP, IDT Entertainment, Starz Media Canada, and Arc Productions. With more authority than most people (if not all), I can clearly tell you that Jam Filled is not the same company.

560 Employees that worked for Arc Productions can tell you same.John Hickson (talk) 18:46, 4 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Strong keep. Even if Jhickson's assertion is correct, Arc Productions and Starz Animation satisfy the notability requirements. An article should exist on that company. Whether the history of JFT needs unwound from that article and put in a separate article (or not have an article at all) is a separate matter. —C.Fred (talk) 18:49, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:17, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:17, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  19:17, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  19:17, 4 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.