Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jama Software


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:25, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Jama Software

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Blatant Promotions. Typical Press coverage on Online Media for funding and such news. Only intention is to promote the company and nothing else. from the writing of this articles, appears a Paid PR/ marketing work on wikipedia. Light2021 (talk) 19:14, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  20:24, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  20:24, 15 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete -- an unremarkable private company; notability not established. Promo content includes:
 * Jama has over 600 customers,[2] including: SpaceX Northrop Grumman Texas Instruments[14] The U.S. Department of Defense
 * Wikipedia is not a sales brochure or an investor prospectus. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:24, 19 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete -- not much more than a press release, and a rather uninformative one at that. Even if the company were notable (and the article doesn't establish that it is), this article should still be deleted on the grounds that contributes almost nothing to the reader's understanding of either the company or its products.  Ross Fraser (talk) 17:16, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails GNG, references fail criteria for establishing notability WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing ++ 20:06, 20 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.