Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamaica–Serbia relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Closed early per WP:SNOW. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 15:40, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Jamaica–Serbia relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Bilateral relations are not inherently notable (see Articles for deletion/Argentina–Latvia relations for recent precedent), and nothing in particular sets this relationship apart. The two don't even have embassies with each other. Biruitorul Talk 15:36, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete these two tiny countries do not have a bilateral relationship that would make a separate article on that relationship sufficiently notable for inclusion here -- to whit, there are no reliable sources that discuss this relationship in any detail -- just mentions of brief meetings between ministers, exchanges of pleasantries and the like.Bali ultimate (talk) 16:28, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete One country isn't even represented by proxy in the other, the other has one in a different country. No notable connection between the two compared to any other random pairing (and this one is pretty random!). Does not justify its own article. -- BlueSquadron Raven  16:57, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I did a google news archive search and couldn't find any evidence of a meaningful relationship between these two countries. Cazort (talk) 17:16, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails my new standards. No details, no cites, no embassies. Bearian (talk) 18:26, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions.  --  I 'mperator 19:51, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not meet WP:N standards. Pastor Theo (talk) 23:02, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete does this really deserve an article, I can almost bet there are no embassies of either country in the other country. LibStar (talk) 03:36, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete mon - If one country doesn't have an embassy in the other, and the other's embassy is in a different country, then it surely can't be notable. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess) | (talk to me) | (What I've done)  09:38, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Snowball in Jamaica. Although Jamaica and Serbia are well-known separately for tourism and genocide, respectively, they're both relatively small countries, and it's unlikely that there would be any cooperation between the two on anything. Mandsford (talk) 12:39, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, per DitzyNizzy, more or less.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 14:24, April 15, 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.