Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamaica–Spain relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) MJ94 (talk) 01:01, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Jamaica–Spain relations

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

While I do agree that an article, perhaps, about the relationships between Spain and Jamaica should exist, this version might not be the best representation of what the article could be. Various problems - the reference, the prose. is non-neutral and utilizes the tourism website for a source. SarahStierch (talk) 20:43, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep: Considering that Jamaica was once a territory of Spain, and still has definite Spanish traces, the article subject in itself is certainly legitimate (unless the bilateral relations–series of articles covers recent events only, and unless it cannot be covered under the History of Jamaica). The article as it is is not so bad as to require deletion prior to improvement. הסרפד  (call me “Hasirpad”) (formerly R——bo) 22:58, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions.  הסרפד  (call me “Hasirpad”) (formerly R——bo) 22:58, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions.  הסרפד  (call me “Hasirpad”) (formerly R——bo) 23:00, 6 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep Whatever the quality of the current article, a clear historical and current bilateral relationship exists, see .--TM 23:01, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions.  הסרפד  (call me “Hasirpad”) (formerly R——bo) 23:01, 6 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Strong keep We do not need to delete articles based on quality. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 00:40, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
 * "quality" is a vague concept. LibStar (talk) 02:43, 10 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep As stated above, the article is in horrible shape, but its clear the two countries have diplomatic relationships. No argument of notability so it seems like the other issues are surmountable. Mkdw talk 08:52, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep The history of their relations (colony and colonial power) is the reason for maintaining the article. Jan CZ (talk) 19:09, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep being a former territory means there is a historial relationship between the 2 countries. articles like this show an ongoing notable relationship. LibStar (talk) 02:43, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep — I have removed the text that originated on the Hospitality Jamaica website, an obvious copyright infringement, and thus rewritten the article in a style consistent with other articles on diplomatic relations. Mephistophelian / discuss / email 06:54, 12 January 2013 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.