Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamal Forbes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:08, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Jamal Forbes

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Subject doesn't seem to pass WP:NTRACK nor WP:GNG. nearlyevil 665  18:50, 21 March 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:50, 28 March 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   20:55, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  nearlyevil  665  18:50, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
 * 9."Have a non-relay mark listed on the IAAF senior all-time list or equivalent list" Forbes is listed on the IAAF senior all time list ranked (1651) with a time of 10.28. Jahamian876242 (talk) 19:22, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
 * As seen here Jahamian876242 (talk) 22:01, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:26, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete the sourcng lacks the depth to show a passing of GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:23, 6 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.