Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamal Malik


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Störm   (talk)  17:38, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Jamal Malik

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No coverage in WP:RS. Being a professor doesn't mean to have profile on WP. He fails WP:NPROF. Störm  (talk)  17:21, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:35, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:35, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:35, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep as WP:AUTHOR; wrote and edited multiple books published with Uni presses. Here are sample reviews:


 * Islam in South Asia: A Short History By Jamal Malik. Hermansen, Marcia. Journal of Islamic Studies, Jan 01, 2011; Vol. 22, No. 1, p. 93-95. A review of the book "Islam in South Asia: A Short History," by Jamal Malik is present... more


 * Madrasas in South Asia: Teaching Terror? Talib, Mohammad. Journal of Islamic Studies, Sep 01, 2008; Vol. 19, No. 3, p. 426-430. The article reviews the book "Madrasas in South Asia: Teaching Terror?," edited by Jamal Malik... more


 * Book reviews: South Asia. Kozlowski, Gregory C. Journal of Asian Studies, Feb 01, 1998; Vol. 57, No. 1, p. 254-255. Reviews the book Colonialization of Islam: Dissolution of Traditional Institutions in... more


 * More are likely to be available, given that they been published with Routlege, Oxford University Press, etc. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:48, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't think these are well-known works. If they were, then they must be critically reviewed and would have article on Wikipedia. There is no coverage in WP:RS and he fails WP:GNG. Can't pass WP:AUTHOR for merely publishing the books. Störm   (talk)  12:45, 24 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep per sources by K.e.coffman.  Mar4d  ( talk ) 03:06, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak keep decently cited on GS. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:40, 24 October 2017 (UTC).
 * Keep, chair with multiple well-cited publications. —Kusma (t·c) 09:26, 25 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.