Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamal Muhammad Alawi Mar'i (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Nomination withdrawn, other form of name gives the results I couldn't find for the article title. Fram (talk) 13:22, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Jamal Muhammad Alawi Mar'i

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:BIO. For this WP:BLP, no reliable independent indepth sources are available. The only two non-US goevrnment sources in the article are a blog and an article in the Miami Herald that mentions his name in a list of released detainees. Google Books lists Wikipedia republishers, the only result through Google Scholar has one sentence about him, Google News Archive only gives the name in a list of detainees, and regular Google gives only 46 hits. Previous AfD (5 years ago) was listed as "no consensus". Fram (talk) 12:26, 3 December 2010 (UTC) Withdrawn, thanks to IQinn. Fram (talk) 13:22, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment by blog you mean Andy Worthington's articles? Why Obama Must Continue Releasing Yemenis From Guantánamo Why Obama Must Continue Releasing Yemenis From Guantánamo and UN Secret Detention Report (Part Three): Proxy Detention, Other Countries’ Complicity, and Obama’s Record. He tells parts of Mar’i's story as one of the first victims of “extraordinary rendition” in the “War on Terror”. If you do the Google search with his core name "Jamal Mar'i" -wikipedia you get about 3000 hits including this one. IQinn (talk) 12:50, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * No, by "blog" I mean the external link in the article to . Are we certain that all these Jamal Mari links are about this one, or are there different people with the same and similar names involved, as is often the case with these Guantanamo related articles? Note also that many of these hits are from the same pages over and over again, as indicated by the only 69 distinct Google hits. Fram (talk) 13:10, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.