Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James & Evander


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 18:22, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

James & Evander
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Nonnotable electropop duo; the only claim to notability is related to flunked wikipedia documentary with deleted article. - Altenmann >t 02:34, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  —  Gongshow  Talk 05:24, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this music duo. Joe Chill (talk) 20:18, 29 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep: There is no reason for Wikipedia to be deleting quality pages simply because someone defines them as irrelevant. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.188.251.26 (talk) 21:39, 29 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep: Why is a documentary about Wikipedia (the first and only one known) not notable for some reason? I don't get it. A quick search for "Truth in numbers" gets 'many' results! Planetary (talk) 23:48, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: This is the deletion discussion for James & Evander, not Truth In Numbers. The rationale for deleting the article on Truth In Numbers is explained fully in its own deletion discussion. &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 18:46, 30 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. A band with no albums, no awards, no tours, no radio play, no nothing. The closest thing they have to a claim to fame is having one of their tunes used in an online PSA (supposedly; the link actually just goes to Wikimedia's donation page, and I see no video there) and an as-yet-nonexistent documentary. &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 18:46, 30 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - does not appear to satisfy WP:BAND under any point (at least as of yet, but Wikipedia is not a crystal ball).  Cocytus   [»talk«]  04:06, 3 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete .Jack007 (talk) 19:36, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.