Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James A. Graham (psychologist) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. postdlf (talk) 15:44, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

James A. Graham (psychologist)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

the last AfD was far from convincing in terms of keep. I think he still fails WP:BIO, WP:PROF, and WP:AUTHOR. he does not appear to be really covered in third party coverage as a major advancer of psychology. LibStar (talk) 06:17, 30 September 2014 (UTC) (
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:40, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:40, 30 September 2014 (UTC)


 * weak Keep As I said at the previous afd, he passes author of the basis of the reviews of his books, including a CHOICE review. see thar afd for the details. (He would not pass WP:PROF.)  DGG ( talk ) 23:55, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 23:03, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Comment I'm not usre if ithelps with notability, but he does have a profile here Artw (talk) 07:59, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep I agree with DGG that he meets WP:AUTHOR, but though marginal, he also appears to meet WP:PROF #7. I am One of Many (talk) 05:48, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:28, 14 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Weak keep more or less per DGG's view re WP:AUTHOR. --j⚛e deckertalk 17:50, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.