Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Airey (cricketer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Currently no obvious redirection target, if/when that article is created (in line with other counties) would recommend an editorial decision to redirect should be taken. Daniel (talk) 13:23, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

James Airey (cricketer)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG, nothing in coverage. Störm  (talk)  13:37, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:42, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:42, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:42, 25 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. How many articles like this do we have?  RobinCarmody (talk) 21:16, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. As with so many other articles incorrectly listed for deletion, passes WP:CRIN by virtue of having played List A cricket. DevaCat1 (talk) 12:50, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of Lincolnshire County Cricket Club List A cricketers Has played 1 List-A game, but no coverage. Using a similar precedent to that used by WP:FOOTY where players with 1 or a few games but no coverage, are deleted/redirected. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:57, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete not even close to meeting GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:58, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG, the single List-A appearance doesn't seem to be covered by any substantial source. -- Ashley yoursmile!  18:19, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - there is no redirect target available and one appearance is nowhere near enough when GNG is so comprehensively failed Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:25, 3 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.