Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Avery Craftsman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) '''-- [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Riley_Huntley/You_missed! Cheers, ] Ri l ey   ''' 00:06, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

James Avery Craftsman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Page is a business listing and website link, with no claims or references supporting notability Modern.Jewelry.Historian (talk) 19:08, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment I've added various links to newspaper and magazine articles pertaining to the company. See in particular the long 1991 Texas Monthly article about the company's history. AllyD (talk) 23:26, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is a significant and solidly notable retail chain.  In addition to AllyD's sources, GNews and HighBeam turn up more, such as  .  --Arxiloxos (talk) 02:57, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep A range of press coverage for several years meets WP:N. The only concern is that most of the press coverage is from one state, Texas, but Arxiloxos provides a link from South Carolina, the firm operates in several states, and Texas is bigger than many countries anyway. --Colapeninsula (talk) 12:06, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:21, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:21, 11 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  talk to me! 08:53, 12 December 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.