Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Blight


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:21, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

James Blight

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Apparently a voice actor with no mentions in any reliable secondary sources. Only things I could find were self-published (imdb, etc). Not notable enough to warrant an article, in my opinion. Rockypedia (talk) 17:24, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 17:52, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 17:52, 1 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete I'm not finding *anything* at all RS or not, that isn't a mirror of this Wikipedia page. I would be hard-pressed to even prove WP:EXISTS--Theredproject (talk) 05:10, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't believe that this has been here since 2006! I searched and found nothing! It's truly amazing that somethign that obviously does not satisfy even GNG has been here for so long. (PS: Someone seriously needs to write a vanity script to flag such articles "actor OR singer OR artist OR musician AND living AND under 45 AND no references available from a list of 100 famous reliable sources == flagged!)104.163.148.25 (talk) 07:03, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Actors do not get an automatic free pass over WP:NACTOR just because acting roles are listed — the inclusion test is not "has had roles", but "has received enough reliable source coverage for the having of roles to clear WP:GNG". Like everybody else, I'm finding so little evidence of sourceability beyond Wikipedia mirrors — I can't even find an IMDb profile for him! — that I'm beginning to suspect an outright WP:HOAX. Bearcat (talk) 19:04, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - No RS, not notable, and as said Bearcat, not even sure that it WP:EXISTS. L293D (☎ • ✎) 13:42, 8 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.