Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Campion Conway


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:16, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

James Campion Conway

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Biography of non-notable author. The article was created in AfC and the submission was denied, after which it was moved to mainspace without any modifications. The creator of the draft and the editor who moved the article into mainspace seem to have tag-teamed in a similar way on a few different articles, another one of which is also in AfD at the moment.

Be that as it may, the question is notability, and I can't find any. There is a lot of praise for the author in the article, but none of it is sourced and when I look for sources I only find things like Goodreads and Linkedin and Amazon.com - nothing secondary at all, and nothing that remotely satisfies WP:NAUTHOR or WP:GNG. bonadea contributions talk 13:29, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. bonadea contributions talk 13:31, 13 January 2017 (UTC)


 *  Speedy Delete I can find no WP:RS secondary sources. None.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:23, 13 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete ...the regular kind. Doesn't qualify for A7, since it does make some claim of significance. Doesn't qualify for G11 either, because, while it is promotional, it isn't unambiguously so. But having said that, there is no actual claim to anything that would constitute notability, even if it were true, and I didn't turn up anything to say otherwise. Timothy Joseph Wood  18:35, 13 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.