Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Caplan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:51, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

James Caplan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not seeing enough to verify notability. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:52, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of notability. Iazyges   Consermonor   Opus meum  05:19, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. The nearest we have to a claim of notability is that the subject has written one paper published in a publication describing itself as "an informal letter magazine" which has, according to Google Scholar, received no citations. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 10:36, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
 * See Townsend Letter for more information about the status of this magazine. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 13:50, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - no notability and the article seems to be quackery. MartinezMD (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete just being a businessman does not make one notable, and that all that is even asserted. Almost could be deleted for no coherent claim of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:08, 3 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.