Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Capurro


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 02:02, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

James Capurro
Hoax article. Google searches for both "Johannes Capurro" composer and "James Capurro" composer turn up no results. Delete --Blu Aardvark | (talk) 06:10, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. The very article says he is not notable. --maru (talk) contribs 07:01, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifiable. Capitalistroadster 11:55, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. &mdash;This user has left wikipedia 13:38 2006-01-29
 * Delete. Even though he is a "well-known composer... who wasn't very well known". Peyna 15:40, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoax. According to the article, the subject would have left home to venture about Italy at age 8.  He would have had to have had his private lessons with Haydn (incorrectly spelled in article) by age 1, since Haydn died the year after the subject's birth. &mdash;ERcheck @ 16:12, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete this hoax. It was speedied previously as nonsense. Ben Kidwell 19:14, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as it was deleted yesterday. I've tagged the article as such. Turnstep 20:59, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * No, it wasn't. An article with the same name was speedy deleted as patent nonsense, but this wasn't it. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 01:41, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Was it by the same person? If so, I would think that even if speedy does not technically apply, some admin judgement could go a long way here. Turnstep 14:57, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * To speedy on those grounds it has to be the same content. Doesn't matter if it was the same author. Peyna 15:40, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Latinus 20:20, 30 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.