Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Chichester, Earl of Belfast


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  14:04, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

James Chichester, Earl of Belfast

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable in his own right. He is a courtesy Earl but there is no certainty that he will become a Marquess and we should cross that bridge when we come to it. For now he doesn't seem notable (other than for who his father is) and I don't believe he passes WP:GNG. Uhooep (talk) 14:00, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:26, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:26, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:18, 26 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Fails WP:ANYBIO. Being a hereditary title holder (or a trainee chartered accountant) doesn't confer notability. There are no sources to establish notability under any other NBIO criteria. (That we are relying entirely on a peerage entry, LinkedIn, and classified ads/engagement announcements (to establish even the basic facts) would seem to confirm that significant/independent biographical sources do not exist.) Guliolopez (talk) 19:06, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, lacks reliable news coverage to pass GNG. Jaysonsands (talk) 05:17, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, as for the Earl of Dalkeith  Athel cb (talk) 09:10, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep has a UK Who's Who entry https://doi.org/10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.U10792 Piecesofuk (talk) 15:27, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * As mentioned elsewhere having a UK Who's Who entry is not one of WP's notability criteria. In this case his Who's Who entry simply reads "Born 19 Nov. 1990; s and heir of Marquess of Donegall, qv ; m 2015, Oilbhe, d of late Charles Reid and of Dr Margaret Mary Cahill" Uhooep (talk) 15:49, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * That doesn't add up to notability for me.  Athel cb (talk) 16:45, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:22, 28 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Just because he has a title does not make him notable. Spleodrach (talk) 19:13, 30 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.