Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Conwell Welsh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 12:28, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

James Conwell Welsh

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article asserts hardly any credible claims of significance, much less notability. There is sparse coverage of the subject and I cannot see any evidence of notability. Being one of the board of directors of a bank is not notable. -- Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:30, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:31, 28 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, no claims of notability met. Sir Joseph (talk) 13:43, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -based on what I read in the obit, he fails my standards of notability for lawyers. If a source could be found that he did more for the bar or local governance, I'd change my !vote. Bearian (talk) 22:50, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- fails GNG. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:24, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 22:23, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 22:23, 2 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Subject doesn't meet either of the criteria set forth in WP:ANYBIO.  NewYorkActuary (talk) 22:24, 2 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.