Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Dodkins


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. G7 Wily D 23:45, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

James Dodkins

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion found at WP:GNG and WP:BIO. The article's references are all self-referential, and I could find no coverage from Independent Reliable Sources in a search. PROD was removed by author without comment. MelanieN (talk) 23:48, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  23:55, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Delete - I agree completely with the nominator, this person does not meed the minimum notability guidelines. I would suggest we included Foundations for Customer Centricity‎ with this nomination as well, this is James' book. VViking Talk Edits 12:45, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The book could be nominated separately; I think it is too late to add it to this nomination which has already been running for a day. --MelanieN (talk) 15:24, 7 January 2015 (UTC)


 * speedy delete unnotable. .. Mean as custard (talk) 13:45, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
 * IMO it does not qualify for "speedy delete", which requires that there not even be any claim of significance or importance; the book and the creation of a method probably count as claims of significance. For some reason the author of the article deleted about three-fourths all of the content after it was listed at AfD; to see the original version, look in the history. --MelanieN (talk) 15:24, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I have asked the author at their talk page why they deleted the text. They left the images, so it does not qualify for G7 speedy at this point, but maybe that's what they had in mind. --MelanieN (talk) 15:34, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 8 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete - A7/G7 - I've tagged as such since the nom's blanked the article. – Davey 2010 Talk 23:29, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.