Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Duffy (psychiatrist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:13, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

James Duffy (psychiatrist)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article does not pass GNG or BLP, as it does not cite any reliable and independent sources that cover the doc in depth. I did a Google search for more source and found him listed only on a medical clinic website. There does not appear to be any sources to establish notability. Delta13C (talk) 14:24, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, the article is extremely poorly written and looks like a cross between a resume and a promotion piece. I also find the "voted best doctor since 2001" statement suspect since we would include specific years the individual won even if it were 2001-present. Tivanir2 (talk) 20:01, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:02, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:02, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:02, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:02, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 07:17, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - EricEnfermero has edited out some of the promotional language which is a helpful step to allow us to concentrate on considering notability. It is clear that the subject of this article has some publications to his name, but I can't see anything to suggest that this medical professional is notable when judged against WP:ACADEMIC or WP:GNG. Drchriswilliams (talk) 03:27, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete I thought about this for a while. I thought that the presidency of the Institute of Religion and Health (now the Institute of Spirituality and Health) could be a path to notability, but I can't find anything that suggests that the ISH is itself a notable organization. I don't see anything else that helps him meet WP:GNG or one of the SNGs like WP:PROF or the (often easier) WP:AUTHOR. EricEnfermero (Talk) 06:39, 27 December 2015 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.