Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Duke Mason (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 18:42, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

James Duke Mason

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable individual that fails the notability standards, per WP:Notability (people) (more precisely, WP:Notability (people)) and WP:Notability. Previously deleted several times for the same reason, see Articles for deletion/James Duke Mason, Articles for deletion/James Mason (son of Belinda Carlisle) and Articles for deletion/James Duke Mason (2nd nomination). Sundostund (talk) 17:53, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:46, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:46, 19 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment Couldn't see any references in notable sources, but there is a lot of reference to him as a gay activist, and some references to him as an actor. Borderleinish! Deathlibrarian (talk) 00:05, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Fence - well the Koreans have an article on him, who are we to judge. Honestly, he is "somewhat" notable and i'm using the term "somewhat" very loosely. Some of the 'claims' in his article needs to be investigated such as being a "official surrogate for the campaign of Barack Obama" and his education background. As an actor, he is not even on the radar (his IMDB starmeter is in the 77,000 range). I'm on the fence because of his "somewhat" notability. I will vote for deletion if the 2 notions i pointed above is false or vote for keep if significant source are added to them..--Stemoc (talk) 03:04, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:41, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:17, 3 November 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.