Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James E. Atwater


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  Keep, the delete reasons are thin on rationale. (non-admin close) RMHED (talk) 19:18, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

James E. Atwater

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable &mdash; G716  &lt;T·C&gt; 19:10, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Article has no quality, or importance. DeadmanUndertaker 19:13, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - on first examination seems to pass WP:PROF, as "The person is regarded as a significant expert in his or her area by independent sources" as seems widely cited, including here Extended_Duration_Orbiter - (incidentally article doesn't have notification on it at moment so deletion nomination is a bit broken) -Hunting dog (talk) 19:57, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
 * have added template to page -Hunting dog (talk) 20:05, 1 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.   —David Eppstein (talk) 04:26, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep, based on the Wright Brothers Medal. This ought to be a solid keep, but after looking up his record in the WebOfScience, the citation results are not impressive with top hits at 20, 19, 11, 11, 11. It seems somewhat low for an active experimental subject like physical chemistry. Still, based on the Wright Brothers Medal I think he deserves a keep. Incidentally, I verified that he did receive this award and the info checked out. Nsk92 (talk) 15:50, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per Nsk92, Wright Brothers Medal tips it for me. Pete.Hurd (talk) 16:08, 2 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.