Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James E McWilliams


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

James E McWilliams

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Declined speedy, non notable author/professor Jenuk1985  |  Talk  16:48, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  --  I 'mperator 16:49, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * keep Still an associate professor, but 3 major university press books, held in 800, 600, 200 WorldCat libraries. these are very high counts for an academic book, and show him a an authority in his subject. I'm adding book reviews from RSs. DGG (talk) 17:20, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per DGG, although I think some more sources, especially in the lead paragraph, would be a welcome addition. Tavix | Talk  18:50, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per DGG, he is an auhority on his subject and passes WP:PROF. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:19, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —David Eppstein (talk) 03:20, 11 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.