Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James F. Lacey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 18:19, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

James F. Lacey

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

County-level politician. He does not pass WP:NPOL. The only sources are the local newspaper. There does not seem to be anything extraordinary about his time in office. Rusf10 (talk) 05:30, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 06:27, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 06:27, 20 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails WP:NPOL #3: only one source (two newspaper articles from same newspaper announcing his assumption of the post and his resignation.) SportingFlyer (talk) 00:37, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 21 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete part of our absurdly overly high number of articles on politicians from New Jersey who come no where close to meeting notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:38, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. County freeholder is not an automatic WP:NPOL pass in and of itself, but this article is sourced nowhere near well enough to get him over WP:GNG as more notable than most other county freeholders. As is so often the case, there's a decidedly advertorial campaign brochure spin here, as well: "recipient of the Ocean County College Alumni Association Distinguished Achievement Award"? Why on earth should anybody care? Bearcat (talk) 22:39, 22 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.