Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Faulkner (cricketer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete both per WP:ATHLETE. PeterSymonds (talk)  15:38, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

James Faulkner (cricketer)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable. WP:CRIC convention is that in the absence of other notability, playing at U-19 international level is insufficient to pass WP:ATHLETE. Dweller (talk) 20:12, 20 July 2008 (UTC)


 * NB I'm not sure how to add Jeremy Smith (cricketer) to this nom and I'm feeling a bit sub-par. I'd appreciate it if someone would, or I'll do it myself when I'm next online. --Dweller (talk) 20:15, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

No opposition to deletion. Robert Fleming (talk) 12:47, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  08:49, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Does not meet WP:ATHLETE or the general notability criterion let alone WP:CRIC notability guidelines. If he is any good, Tasmania will give him a game this season and he can be included. -- Mattinbgn\talk 08:54, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete for reasons already given. Andrew nixon (talk) 09:38, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete both per nom. BlackJack | talk page 05:59, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete bothI had started these pages when the received their rookie contracts on the assumption that they would soon be playing first class cricket, but obviously it is more prudent to wait until after the event. I will be happy to redo them once (and if) they make their debuts...


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.