Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Gourlay


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. -- zzuuzz(talk) 12:33, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

James Gouraly


Possibly non-notable, possibly fails WP:BIO. Asking for ruling.  Cool Blue  Light my Fire! 00:32, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete, reading the article, he seems to have some notability. But without sources, the information is unreliable. (I like that tuba, though...) :-) --Cremepuff222  ( talk,  review me! ) 00:45, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article was created with a spelling error in the title. The correct spelling is James Gourlay. His records alone make him notable, I think. There are many references for him when you search on Google with the correct spelling. --Eastmain 01:04, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - the article is puffery as written but searching through news articles shows he will easily pass WP:BIO requirements. Very well known musician, judge in international concerts, present on a few music releases I can find, quite a few mentions in news articles etc... - Peripitus (Talk) 01:47, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep per above two justifications. --Wikipedian, Historian, and Friend? 16:14, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * just opined "strong keep" in 27 AFD discussions over a period of 35 minutes, several times with clearly disruptive rationales. Uncle G 16:48, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep; seems notable enough to me. --ElKevbo 21:18, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, the Philip Jones Brass Ensemble is a notable band, and the adjectives in the articles can be removed (an anti-adjective bot might come in handy; it should be easy to write. ). DGG 23:22, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Satisfies WP:Music. Cricket02 19:09, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.