Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James H. Hurley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is that WP:PROF is met. (non-admin closure) BethNaught (talk) 10:20, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

James H. Hurley

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:BIO. Only source is a faculty listing, non-notable professor. Kindzmarauli (talk) 20:05, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:18, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:18, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:18, 30 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - holds a named chair appointment (WP:PROF) per this. EricEnfermero  HOWDY! 19:04, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. As well as the pass of WP:PROF indicated above, he also passes #C1 with (according to his Google scholar profile) 44 publications cited 100 or more times and an h-index of 66. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:01, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:24, 6 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep per the very relevant comments by EricEnfermero and David Eppstein. Holder of a named chair at Berkeley ain't chopped liver. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  04:10, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - WP:PROF, criterion 2 and 5. Since the nomination sources have been added. I agree with earlier commenters that a named chair at a noted University makes him noteworthy for an article of his own. Also I consider the prize in their own field a recognition that this person is at the top of their field of study. -- Taketa (talk) 07:46, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.