Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James H Lyons


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-01-02 08:11Z 

James H Lyons

 * — (View AfD)

There are no provided sources for this article and nor are any independent ones to be found by a Google search. There are few claims to notability. No Retreat No Surrender


 * Delete, fails WP:BIO, no external sources. The only claims to notability are getting a photo featured on the front page at fotopic.net (if I get an article featured on the Wikipedia front page, does that make me notable?), opening a photo gallery and being listed in a web directory. Demiurge 14:03, 28 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. You don't "have to be a god" to be on Wikipedia, you just have to be notable, and this fellow isn't; according to his webpage, he's a college student who wants to be a photographer.  That isn't enough to sustain notability.  RGTraynor 15:03, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

NOTE www.jameshlyons.com is not the same person! userTheno2003

Cheers john Denham User:Theno2003 28th December 2006 15:23


 * Delete. Extremely unnotable. Also fails WP:BIO. -- S onicChao talk 15:37, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, no WP:RS indicating subject meets WP:BIO. Author appears to consent to deletion per latest version of article, so can possibly be CSD G7ed. -- Kinu t /c  21:17, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

" I the author has place the page back up as i feel the person deserves a page. I do not consent to deletion" User:Theno2003


 * Keep, Person is notable in the area of havering. I feel on the grounds of what i have been shown and from i have heard from the local area, as the person lives in the same area as i do. I feel "James H Lyons" Is notable enough to stay. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.132.229.225 (talk) 02:26, 31 December 2006 (UTC).

"Will the above anon person please msg me, i am the author of the article and would like to know what you know!!! : Note Grammer correct in last two edits." Theno2003


 * Delete, needs reliable sources. --Duke of Duchess Street 03:28, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Would you please stop asking for "Reliable sources and give me some examples! So i can bring them to the debate. Thank you. ! User:Theno2003
 * Glad you asked. Follow this link: Wikipedia: Reliable Sources.  Boiled down, "reliable sources" involve citations in mainstream print media, publications in non-vanity-press books and magazines and the like.  RGTraynor 21:12, 31 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, no verifiable information sufficient to establish notability. TheMindsEye 21:36, 31 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.