Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Harbic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 13:10, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

James Harbic

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Possible autobigraphical (but definitely COI) promotional article about a lawyer of questionable notability. Per this talk page post, the article creator is the subject's son. A Google search on "James Harbic" "constitutional rights" lawyer shows only 4 results. A search on "James Harbic" Ottawa lawyer shows only 74 unique returns, with little significant coverage of Harbic himself - articles are generally about his clients. MikeWazowski (talk) 15:30, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:34, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:35, 17 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 14:25, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Delete notwithstanding the size of the article and its claims. Drmies (talk) 03:24, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steven   Zhang  Join the DR army! 03:42, 1 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - In addition to the accurate nomination, much of the article itself isn't about the subject. WP:GNG not met. ŞůṜīΣĻ ¹98¹ Speak 05:02, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.