Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Harvey Logan

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was KEEP

James Harvey Logan
38 hits on google but yet the claim lies that he was the "source" for the word loganberry. Does this in turn make this horticulturist worthy of inclusion on Wikipedia? GRider\talk 20:33, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * I would say so. Keep.  -Sean Curtin 02:46, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, just notable enough - developer of the loganberry and Superior Court Judge. Megan1967 06:02, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Developing an edible and cultivated fruit means that he is notable enough. Capitalistroadster 10:11, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * A tiny stub that would probably serve better as a redirect to loganberry. -R. fiend 09:30, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect. ComCat 02:10, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)