Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Hyland


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. A lack of reliable sources outweighs any other arguments. Kevin (talk) 01:30, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

James Hyland

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Lack of independant 3rd party reliable sources. Not verified. Does not meet BIO. Not notable. Kittybrewster  &#9742;  22:39, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:26, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep and improve per sourcable assertions of notability. Their lack is always a concern, but when they are available, what can be improved through regular editing is a reason to fix, not delete. I believe the acclaim of his works as shared here, and the awards he's won as listed here can be sourced... specially with the hints of origin as provided.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 08:30, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. If you remove the puffery and sources belonging to him, you have a guy that doesn't look like he passes WP:CREATIVE. Niteshift36 (talk) 08:10, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete. Can't find any non-primary sources. Googlehits mostly refer to other people with the same name.-- Pink Bull  20:42, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The page, as I created it, used non-primary sources. Agree that puffery happened along the way, mainly using changes not made by myself.--TimothyJacobson (talk) 13:07, 1 February 2010 (UTC)