Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Joachim Hurtak


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I'll restore and draftify upon request. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:55, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

James Joachim Hurtak

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability. Practically the entire content is based on Hurtak's own work. I haven't found anything better, at least not in remotely reliable sources (see here for the probably less reliable sources that cover Hurtak's less mainstream work which currently is not discussed in the article). Huon (talk) 21:57, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 14:06, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 14:06, 20 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not a single cite on GS, so no pass of WP:Prof. Maybe other people can find more. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:25, 20 April 2017 (UTC).
 * Due to life events, it's been years since I've worked on Wikipedia entries so please forgive any lack of proper formatting in this reply comment. I did reply on the "talk" page for this but want to mention here as well that I am currently researching. I see the valid points raised. Is it appropriate for me to take down the article while I work on it? --Nel4316 (talk) 16:01, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:24, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:24, 23 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Article depends on primary sourcing, appears to be a non-notable WP:FRINGE theorist. Article creator Nel4316 asks to have it moved to userspace, but it was created 3 years ago.  User:Nel4316 can you provide some sources that indicate that, given time, a reasonable article could be created?E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:59, 24 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.