Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Lisney


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. The nomination and one other had concerns over independent sourcing establishing notability which have been found and added to a (now) significantly improved article (non-admin closure)  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 00:19, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

James Lisney

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

NN entertainer. No independent sources. And the article made by an SPA. Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 17:37, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Well... not quite a SPA, as the author did edit other articles from January through November of 2007. However, he does not seem to have a hand on WP:PEOPLE.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 21:19, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  17:58, 10 September 2014 (UTC)




 * Delete. The fellow exists and can be found written of in music-related books, and may be the best concert pianist in the world... but I do not see enough outside his own website with which to build an article. Does anyone feel he meets WP:CREATIVE or WP:ANYBIO #2?  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 21:11, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 11 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. The article just needs some sources:, , , , , &#32; (talk) 09:32, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment I have worked a bit on the article: wikified, added sources, discography and authority control. I hope that addresses your concerns, . &#32; (talk) 21:27, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep – The sources provided, even if provided by those !voting "delete", seem widely spread and reliable. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 10:20, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - In addition to the discography of his own record company, mentioned on his web site, there is his discography at AllMusic. That and the reviews listed by are enough to convince me. --Stfg (talk) 15:10, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 18:24, 17 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep per sources found & added, Passes GNG. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  22:48, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.