Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Lodge (ice hockey)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 02:53, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

James Lodge (ice hockey)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable per WP:NHOCKEY as he hasn't played in a top-level professional league. Ahecht (TALK PAGE ) 18:28, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

There is no reason to delete the article for James Lodge. He has signed an entry level contract with the Winnipeg Jets of the National Hockey League. WpgJets4Life (talk) 19:35, 3 June 2015 (UTC)WpgJets4Life PAGE''' ]]) 20:24, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Lots and lots of players sign contracts with major teams and never play a single NHL game. That is why we have the standard of WP:NHOCKEY which clearly states that they must've actually played for a team in a top-level league. --Ahecht ([[User_talk:Ahecht|'''TALK
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:58, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:58, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:58, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:59, 4 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete: as failing NHOCKEY, with no evidence the subject meets the GNG. I'm also nominating four other articles created by WpgJets4Life that likewise are mid-level prospects who fail NHOCKEY and with only routine sports coverage debarred by WP:ROUTINE to show. (Three other articles passed NHOCKEY.) I urge WpgJets4Life to read WP:GNG and WP:NHOCKEY for a better understanding of the criteria for notability for potential articles.   Ravenswing   21:54, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable minor hockey player who fails to meet WP:NHOCKEY or WP:GNG. Can be recreated when/if he achieves notability. -DJSasso (talk) 17:57, 5 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - No evidence of notability. Fails WP:HOCKEY. Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 00:28, 10 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.