Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Longstreet (security) (0th nomination)

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep. BLANKFAZE | (&#1095;&#1090;&#1086;??) 00:32, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)

James Longstreet (security)
Personal page - not encyclopedic doles 06:29, 2005 Mar 6 (UTC)
 * Delete, vanity. Tygar 08:44, Mar 6, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, straight-up vanity. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 09:13, Mar 8, 2005 (UTC)
 * All that I know about this person is that in December 2004 he and a number of others made a big splash at BugTraq, Slashdot, and the news services (, , and the wire services), as the discoverer of a number of security flaws in Unix . Given that we keep politicians' wives that make the news for reckless driving (Votes for deletion/Eli Hagen) and local politicians that make the news for writing electronic mail (Votes for deletion/John Paul Jenkins)) do we keep graduate students who make the news for making discoveries? Weak Keep. Uncle G 16:39, 2005 Mar 10 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - he made a small amount of actual news in the actual world for an actual reason - David Gerard 10:07, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Actual Keep per above. Kappa 22:24, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.