Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Loxton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. (non-admin closure) Enos733 (talk) 19:51, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

James Loxton

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable rugby player. I am not seeing anything to indicate he passes WP:NSPORT or WP:GNG, with the only coverage being either signing info, match reports, and stats pages. Primefac (talk) 10:43, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Sports, Rugby union, Germany, Ireland, United Kingdom,  and Wales. Primefac (talk) 10:43, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. My own WP:BEFORE has thrown up quite a bit of coverage of the eligibility debate (between the WRU, IRFU and IRB) which is at least contributory under a form of WP:LASTING. I've updated the article with the refs/etc. Not cut-and-dried (hence "weak keep"). But, when in a grey area, I'd lean towards a keep... Guliolopez (talk) 11:46, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep I'd go keep on this one given what Guliolopez has been able to find. Seems to be enough there (albeit just) for the article to be kept. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:08, 27 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep Guliolopez found a good amount of coverage, particularly due to the IRB eligibility situation.
 * RodneyParadeWanderer (talk) 13:40, 30 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.