Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James M. Roe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:56, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

James M. Roe

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unsourced BLP. No sources to support notability. No reliable sources in ghits. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 00:21, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.   —Espresso Addict (talk) 01:27, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete--the article says it already, 'amateur astronomer.' And if he is a 'recorded discoverer' of anything, where's the record? Even if it is on 'Jim and Yvonne's home,' that still is not acceptable as a source. Drmies (talk) 02:49, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Notability not established. ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:46, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 06:58, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete – Sorry to say, at this time does not meet Notability guidelines under any of the current standards. I was able to find one 3rd party reference, as noted here , but again, sorry to say, one piece does not make for notability. ShoesssS Talk 18:36, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Could not find anything that would qualify him under WP:N. The only piece of news that I found was the one uncovered by ShoesssS.--Eric Yurken (talk) 23:33, 2 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.