Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Mallinson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep considering Snow because, although it's only be a day, everything is suggesting that not only is the nomination not substantiating but there is certainly enough here (NAC). SwisterTwister  talk  18:52, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

James Mallinson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete. Not noteworthy. Stub. Not much editing going on for years. VictoriaGraysonTalk 22:37, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. The problem seems to be this edit, which removed from the lede the fact that this person is a multiple Grammy-award winner, which meets criteria for inherent notability. WP:ANYBIO criteria 1: "The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for one several times". In this case, the subject has received fifteen of them. bd2412  T 00:39, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep He won the very first "Producer of the Year" Grammy Award for classical music in 1979, and has won many other Grammys since then. The article should be improved, not deleted. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  05:50, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Neither "Stub" nor "Not much editing going on for years" comes anywhere near to being a reason for deletion, and just saying "Not noteworthy" without giving any explanation doesn't give any reason either: See WP:JUSTNOTNOTABLE. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:10, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per previous comments. Notability not in doubt. There may be an appearance of indirect conflict in that this nomination was submitted by the creator of the competing (for primary topic) article James Mallinson (author). &mdash;Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 13:25, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. KGirlTrucker81talk what I'm been doing 17:31, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per bd2412, subject appears to be more than sufficiently worthy of note. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 23:13, 26 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.