Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Mason (neo-Nazi)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Killiondude (talk) 05:19, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

James Mason (neo-Nazi)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Very few citations, google returns few independent reliable sources. Person is not likely notable enough to warrant an article. BrxBrx(talk)(please reply with { {re 17:53, 16 April 2018 (UTC)]


 * Keep -- First of all, "No actual reason given for deletion." The number of citations is irrelevant.  The number of GHits is irrelevant.  If nom only thinks notability is "not likely" then it's not likely time to nominate yet.  Secondly, this person is exceedingly notable.  An easy pass of the GNG.  He is discussed in George Lincoln Rockwell's bio, in Black Sun, an immensely important history of neo-Nazism, and here, and more recently in connection with the killers of Blaze Bernstein and atomwaffen, , . 192.160.216.52 (talk) 18:01, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - Sourced, notable. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:19, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 13:12, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 13:12, 17 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete we wouldn't keep a person with this type of profile in a mainstream political party; I don't see a reason to have looser standards for fringe figures. If Siege magazine is notable, it should have an entry of its own; I don't feel the voluminousness of a fringe publication makes this person notable.  The coverage in "The Emergence of a Euro-American Radical Right" (linked above) might be enough to meet GNG, but I don't think it's enough on its own, and am not convinced by any of the other sources. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 22:54, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * The "Siege" material is very influential in the neo-Nazi community. That doesn't make it palatable, but it does make it, and its author, notable. Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:34, 23 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep. Subject has been well publicized and is sufficiently notable to have his papers archived in a library at the University of Kansas and to have his writings sold on Amazon.   Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 09:42, 23 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.