Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Mason (son of Belinda Carlisle)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 02:33, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

James Mason (son of Belinda Carlisle)
NN (not notable, vanity, see WP:BIO). ≈ jossi ≈ t &bull; @ 02:10, 8 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Man, you're fast. I had tagged it, and you had it on AfD before I had a chance.  Anyway, children of celebs aren't special enough to get their own articles.  --Bayyoc 02:15, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Richardcavell 02:33, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete ---|Newyorktimescrossword 02:38, 8 May 2006 (UTC)|
 * Delete Definetly not notable. Bill (who is cool!) 2:42, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Alex&#32;&#40;t&#41; 03:54, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Being the son of someone famous and having "political ambitions" doesn't make someone notable enough for an encyclopaedia. Zaxem 04:50, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. He doesn't meet WP:BIO as a 14 year old son of a famous pop singer who supposedly wants to be president. However, Jossi could you please expand your nominations. I know that nn means not-notable but not everyone else does. Capitalistroadster 06:01, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
 * It also helps to know how you decided the topic was non-notable. In this case I would say that he is non-notable because the only thing he is known for is being the son of someone famous, with no accomplishments or fame of his own. -- Kjkolb 10:08, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable teenager. J I P  | Talk 06:13, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as not notable. DarthVad e r 08:06, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete -- getcrunk   juice  contribs 21:19, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Request could the nominator please give reasons for this nomination? Non-notable is a value judgement and not a core criterion for deletion. Vizjim 16:03, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * When did it become neccesary to expand on non-notable? There is no claim to notability, thus the article fails the WP:BIO standards.  There are so many vanity pages to be deleted, is it practical to give a detailed reason for every AfD nomination?  Besides, the precident is well established that nn is an acceptable abbreviation for "non notable".  I would have speedied the article but for the fact that that it is a celebrity's son.  Otherwise, it definitely meets the criteria for deletion.--Bayyoc 18:10, 9 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment: You shouldn't say "non-notable" anyway. Stifle (talk) 21:33, 9 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


 * Delete as failing WP:BIO M1ss1ontomars2k4 04:10, 13 May 2006 (UTC)