Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Morton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. BD2412 T 00:18, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

James Morton
NN bio. I get 60 unique Google hits searching for "James Morton Osgoode Hall". howcheng  [ t &#149; c &#149; w &#149;  e  ] 23:52, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Some lawyer dude. If he had ever been involved in any notable case he would have said so. Pilatus 02:35, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete too obscure, probably vanity --Mecanismo 15:01, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete I did manage to find out that the claim of having written (or co-written) the legal text "Discovery: Principles in Practice" seems to be true. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  20:39, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per Pilatus. Stifle 09:56, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete -- there are hundreds of lawyers in downtown Toronto with similar qualifications. Skeezix1000 12:27, 8 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.