Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Pipas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 12:31, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

James Pipas

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non-notable scientist Therapyisgood (talk) 18:37, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:39, 18 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep miserable failure of a deletion nomination, basically WP:JUSTNOTNOTABLE, with no attempt at evaluation by WP:PROF. He clearly passes #C5 (named chair) based only on the text of the article as nominated, and even a cursory search of Google Scholar also shows heavy enough citations to pass #C1. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:56, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep As noted above, he passes WP:PROF and C5, and the nomination makes no attempt to argue otherwise. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 19:47, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep Named chair - obvious pass of WP:PROF, nevermind citations, etc. -Kj cheetham (talk) 20:01, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep He holds a named chair at a major university so he clearly meets the academic notability guidelines. There is no reason however to speedy this discussion.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:16, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment I for one was thinking of speedy under WP:SKCRIT #3. It may yet turn into a WP:SNOW in any case. -Kj cheetham (talk) 19:22, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Nomination does not explain a legitimate reason for deletion, the subject clearly meets NPROF. WP:SNOW would be apt. PainProf (talk) 22:34, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Clear pass of WP:Prof. Nominator should carry out WP:Before before making further nominations. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:41, 24 August 2020 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.