Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James R. Bailey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:16, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

James R. Bailey

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I don't see a WP:NPROF pass here, and I don't see a WP:GNG pass either. The sources in the article are all WP:SPS; searching online, I find basically no news sources (although he's published a few op-eds and quoted in a few others), it doesn't look like WP:SIGCOV to me. jp×g 04:25, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. jp×g 04:25, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. jp×g 04:25, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep I think there is a pass of WP:Prof here. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:48, 11 December 2021 (UTC).
 * Not to be a dick, but where? It looks like he partially fulfills criterion 5 with the named professorship position, but it's not a chair position, as far as I can tell. jp×g 06:17, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * WP:PROF. Xxanthippe (talk) 08:11, 11 December 2021 (UTC).


 * Keep. I'm not entirely sure of the nature of the "Hochberg Professorial Fellow of Leadership Development" (the actual title) and whether it is really a chair/professorship or something else (the "Fellow" part is a little unusual and is throwing me off). But I think the case for WP:PROF through many well-cited publications is strong, as is the case for #C8 as editor-in-chief of a notable if strangely-named journal, Academy of Management Learning and Education. There may also be a case for WP:AUTHOR if we can replace the spammy Amazon links with proper reviews. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:39, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Clearly Passes WP:Prof & WP:AUTHOR Juggyevil (talk) 08:59, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep passes WP:PROF.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:49, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment: I am perfectly willing to withdraw this nomination if someone finds RS talking about "significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources" (per WP:NPROF). I was unable to. At present, all I see is a single citation to his profile on a university webpage, as well as two citations to books that he wrote (which are perfectly valid citations to back up the fact that he wrote the books per WP:ABOUTSELF, they do not seem to do anything to demonstrate notability). jp×g 12:21, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Take a look at the scholar link four inches above. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:42, 11 December 2021 (UTC).


 * Keep Agree with the keep voters and what David Epstein said. MartinWilder (talk) 03:47, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes WP:Prof. Brayan ocaner (talk) 23:44, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Would appear to meet WP:NPROF #5 as holder of a named professorial chair. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:54, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. jp×g 23:21, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Are you going to withdraw your nomination? Xxanthippe (talk) 00:17, 17 December 2021 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.