Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James R. Bath


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 13:35, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

James R. Bath

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Scandal-mongering BLP about a Bush associate whose weak claim to notoriety rests in stale six year old accusations that didn't apparently amount to much. See also Articles for deletion/Southwest Airport Services (2nd nomination). Mangoe (talk) 02:31, 15 May 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:42, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Subject of a full-length profile in Time Magazine; more than a hundred hits on Google books ; whether he likes it or not, this guy is notable. --MelanieN (talk) 22:47, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep — A notable public figure. Article is poorly written and needs work, but that's not a capital crime on WP, god knows... Carrite (talk) 19:29, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

Keep:Google books are good enough for me, as is time. Could use some immediate improvement (BLP, and all), but definitely notable. Buddy431 (talk) 03:38, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Keep Books/Time looks like enough. Definitely needs some improvement, but notable enough.--Joe Decker (talk) 05:49, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.