Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Rhine (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  06:59, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

James Rhine
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NCREATIVE; probably unsalvageable as I'm unable to find much more than salacious and/or passing references to this person; media since the Big Brother show was on air appear to be unusable items like "Big Brother Status Check: Which Couples Are Still Together?" This probably explains why nobody has bothered to expand this since it was tagged ten years ago with a single reference. What should be the BLP's most notable show – co-host or whatever of 3 Guys in a Booth – doesn't even have a Wikipedia article and apparently only played on some US terrestrial digital subchannels. ☆ Bri (talk) 15:53, 23 April 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  02:57, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Florida. Shellwood (talk) 16:33, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete The sourcing is clearly not there to justify an article. Wikipedia is not meant to be a tabloid mirror, and that is what we would have to become to even come close to have enough sourcing to justify this article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:22, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete, fails WP:GNG due to lack of sourcing. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:13, 1 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete This was supposed to remain a redirect before it was turned into an article with apparent WP:OR and unsourced content. I see there is not enough content or sources to justify a stand-alone article. >>> Extorc . talk  06:08, 7 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.