Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Ross Hinton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 06:56, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

James Ross Hinton

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:POLITICIAN, no other notability, no problems on article recreation should candidate win or meet criteria. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  02:18, 14 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - Being a "candidate" is not notable. The only source is the subject speaking about himself?  The only reference is his own website?  --Rpclod (talk) 03:27, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Deletenon-notable and self-sourced promotion Jimfbleak - talk to me?  05:52, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:POLITICIAN. Seems WP:PROMOTION. If he wins it is still WP:TOOSOON right now. Also poorly written: does not even have a political party listed. Delete. --Jersey92 (talk) 14:16, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
 * For what it is worth that seems to not be a draw-back to the article. It appears Hinton has decided to not bother with being part of a political party.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:59, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:POLITICIAN – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  18:59, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 15 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete In the event that he wins he will clearly be notable, but for now he is just one of many independent candidates running in the hundreds of congressional districts.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:57, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly fails WP:POLITICIAN. Tiller54 (talk) 11:29, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Unelected candidates in future elections do not pass WP:POLITICIAN (especially when they're relying this heavily on primary and unreliable sources.) No prejudice against recreation in November if he wins the election, but he is not entitled to keep a campaign brochure on Wikipedia in the meantime. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 04:31, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.